2006-11-22
Solid and/or Soup - a Virus in Water
Biological materials are very different from those studied by Classical Science.
Classical Science started with a very simplified set of assumptions; simply because nature is grand and complex, and it was necessary to ‘find a way in’ by starting to understand some simple issues first.
The assumptions that ‘matter is “inert”’ is perhaps the most crippling assumption still used in society. It was based on the assumption - and imposition – of the idea that the universe is “Invariant”. Inert.
The uniVerse is not Invariant; it is an ongoing process of development.
The uniVerse is neither Inert. Yet it can appear to us as such.
It must be kept in mind, that all we perceive is a mental construct.
“The Collapse of the Vector of State”, as Quantum Theory describes it, is the term that describes that the Observer defines and determines the Observation, by the type of involvement.
Thus the mode of involvement must be explicitly described, in order to be able to study and develop science.
Because, whatever we perceive, it is always the result of an interference pattern; of our state of being interacting with that of our context (of which we form part).
The dynamics of the Collapse of the Vector of State is determined by the model of an Interference pattern.
It is the result – in that model – of Constructive and Destructive interference (of waves) that builds the reality that we know. Our Reality is a Realisation.
What quantum theory describes, if it is to be uniVersally true, must apply to us also.
It must then also be valid for this exploratory study on the nature of the Virus.
We can summarise the findings as follows:
The universe, us included, is a wave field.
Every interaction and relationship is an interference pattern between wave fields in a wave field.
This then must apply to a Virus also.
This is why the study of the Virus here is held do apply to both the bio-organism (virus) and informatics code for computation (computer virus).
The construct of an Interference pattern is a clue to be pursued:
Constructive and Destructive interference leads to an Interference pattern of the Moiré type.
This means that we are dealing with a wave pattern within a wave pattern.
This is the basis for a description of Nesting and Embedding; fitting a part into a whole, i.e. relating an object into a context.
Bear in mind that in this approach there is no object separate from a context.
Every object is one with its context; but surrounded by a collapsed wave field of higher order (called a boundary; an interference pattern of wave fields).
It means that every object is a process (an interference pattern).
The relationship between the object and the relation of the object and the context is an interference pattern (process) also.
What then is object?
What is process?
To study this deeper, look as the relationship between a river and a bedding:
The river shapes the bedding, yet the bedding shapes the river.
Regard the same in the gulf streams of the oceans, and the jet streams of the atmosphere.
Likewise there are ionic currents – like smooth lightning snakes – in our ionosphere.
In an electric conductor we see the same: there are electrons of the current, and there are electrons of the atomic metal lattice. How can you tell them apart?
In water – a fluid crystal – we see the same:
water is coherent in droplets of 59 [nm] and incoherent (‘like boiling water’) in-between.
Herbert Fröhlich applied the understanding of atomic lattices of metal to study this.
He calculated the energy needed to liberate an electron from an atomic lattice.
(See “Herbert Fröhlich, FRS, a physicist ahead of his time, ISBN 0-906370-41-8)
In his studies he showed that we are not only dealing with electrons in a lattice; we are simultaneously dealing with the movement of lattices as a whole. Important is to realise that when particles move in a coherent manner (as fields as a whole) they can travel at speeds faster than light. This is a logical consequence of the phase propagation in and of a coherent field). In the description of materials this is called Superconductivity.
Last night I had a dream in which I was shown the relationship between cubic atomic crystals (such as found in a metal atomic lattice) and the free electrons between them. It was ‘explained’ to me, in my dream (an unconscious mental metabolic process) how the two were related. Upon waking I realised that soup referred to sup-er conductivity.
It is this notion that is relevant for this study of the Virus also.
The virus is a nano-tech antenna.
It functions in a context of water.
This means that the Virus presumably links with, maybe even interlocks with, the droplets of coherent water. I can imagine that the ‘legs’ off the virus connect to ‘droplets’ of coherent water.
The water droplets are like mini computers; they can store close to 1000 different frequencies (see the work of Cyril Smith). These frequencies can be matched as interference patterns (with constructive and destructive interference), thus function as logic gates (AND and OR, NAND and NOR gates).
Virus – in this conceptualization – operate these nano-computers.
They bring local coherence between water droplets: the virus serves a s circuit board in a primordial soup of informatics in water.
It is this kind of concept, in which a virus brings coherence in particular forms of coherence in water, that is to be further explored.
The particular forms of coherence in water, as the 59 [nm] droplets described by Cyril Smith.
The particular forms of coherence of the virus, is the antenna shape, and the near metallic structure of molecular coherence, in the form of the Virus.
What can be shown about the relationship between the Virus, and its presumable role in bringing coherence between coherent droplets of water.
The principles described by Fröhlich, about superconductivity in super-coherence will be valid.
Likewise it will be based on the same concepts as those of the ionic streams in the ionospheric ‘bedding”; and a river and a bedding.
It is the relationship between Potential and Kinetic energy (the coherent water, or molecular ‘boiling’ water) which is found also in the Cosmic Gas Cloud, and the Lightning Charge Discharges that compute the location of the stars.
It is all about the relationship between information and matter.
What we perceive in our living body, must be at the basis of the existence of the virus also…
Thence this exploration:
Is the Virus a primordial form of operator, operating on the information in water, in the coherent droplets described by Cyril Smith?
If so, it is likely that a virus is not a pathogen; because it simply computes and has no own mind or meaning.
What then changed in the development of the virus, that it could encapsulate itself, not in a protein sheath but is a double lipid membrane, to develop into a microbe: the bacterial form? (This presupposes an environment in which fatty soap bubbles could form. And engendered a micro environment in which the virus can compute and replicate by dividing itself.)
More questions
More answers ¶ 09:18
Classical Science started with a very simplified set of assumptions; simply because nature is grand and complex, and it was necessary to ‘find a way in’ by starting to understand some simple issues first.
The assumptions that ‘matter is “inert”’ is perhaps the most crippling assumption still used in society. It was based on the assumption - and imposition – of the idea that the universe is “Invariant”. Inert.
The uniVerse is not Invariant; it is an ongoing process of development.
The uniVerse is neither Inert. Yet it can appear to us as such.
It must be kept in mind, that all we perceive is a mental construct.
“The Collapse of the Vector of State”, as Quantum Theory describes it, is the term that describes that the Observer defines and determines the Observation, by the type of involvement.
Thus the mode of involvement must be explicitly described, in order to be able to study and develop science.
Because, whatever we perceive, it is always the result of an interference pattern; of our state of being interacting with that of our context (of which we form part).
The dynamics of the Collapse of the Vector of State is determined by the model of an Interference pattern.
It is the result – in that model – of Constructive and Destructive interference (of waves) that builds the reality that we know. Our Reality is a Realisation.
What quantum theory describes, if it is to be uniVersally true, must apply to us also.
It must then also be valid for this exploratory study on the nature of the Virus.
We can summarise the findings as follows:
The universe, us included, is a wave field.
Every interaction and relationship is an interference pattern between wave fields in a wave field.
This then must apply to a Virus also.
This is why the study of the Virus here is held do apply to both the bio-organism (virus) and informatics code for computation (computer virus).
The construct of an Interference pattern is a clue to be pursued:
Constructive and Destructive interference leads to an Interference pattern of the Moiré type.
This means that we are dealing with a wave pattern within a wave pattern.
This is the basis for a description of Nesting and Embedding; fitting a part into a whole, i.e. relating an object into a context.
Bear in mind that in this approach there is no object separate from a context.
Every object is one with its context; but surrounded by a collapsed wave field of higher order (called a boundary; an interference pattern of wave fields).
It means that every object is a process (an interference pattern).
The relationship between the object and the relation of the object and the context is an interference pattern (process) also.
What then is object?
What is process?
To study this deeper, look as the relationship between a river and a bedding:
The river shapes the bedding, yet the bedding shapes the river.
Regard the same in the gulf streams of the oceans, and the jet streams of the atmosphere.
Likewise there are ionic currents – like smooth lightning snakes – in our ionosphere.
In an electric conductor we see the same: there are electrons of the current, and there are electrons of the atomic metal lattice. How can you tell them apart?
In water – a fluid crystal – we see the same:
water is coherent in droplets of 59 [nm] and incoherent (‘like boiling water’) in-between.
Herbert Fröhlich applied the understanding of atomic lattices of metal to study this.
He calculated the energy needed to liberate an electron from an atomic lattice.
(See “Herbert Fröhlich, FRS, a physicist ahead of his time, ISBN 0-906370-41-8)
In his studies he showed that we are not only dealing with electrons in a lattice; we are simultaneously dealing with the movement of lattices as a whole. Important is to realise that when particles move in a coherent manner (as fields as a whole) they can travel at speeds faster than light. This is a logical consequence of the phase propagation in and of a coherent field). In the description of materials this is called Superconductivity.
Last night I had a dream in which I was shown the relationship between cubic atomic crystals (such as found in a metal atomic lattice) and the free electrons between them. It was ‘explained’ to me, in my dream (an unconscious mental metabolic process) how the two were related. Upon waking I realised that soup referred to sup-er conductivity.
It is this notion that is relevant for this study of the Virus also.
The virus is a nano-tech antenna.
It functions in a context of water.
This means that the Virus presumably links with, maybe even interlocks with, the droplets of coherent water. I can imagine that the ‘legs’ off the virus connect to ‘droplets’ of coherent water.
The water droplets are like mini computers; they can store close to 1000 different frequencies (see the work of Cyril Smith). These frequencies can be matched as interference patterns (with constructive and destructive interference), thus function as logic gates (AND and OR, NAND and NOR gates).
Virus – in this conceptualization – operate these nano-computers.
They bring local coherence between water droplets: the virus serves a s circuit board in a primordial soup of informatics in water.
It is this kind of concept, in which a virus brings coherence in particular forms of coherence in water, that is to be further explored.
The particular forms of coherence in water, as the 59 [nm] droplets described by Cyril Smith.
The particular forms of coherence of the virus, is the antenna shape, and the near metallic structure of molecular coherence, in the form of the Virus.
What can be shown about the relationship between the Virus, and its presumable role in bringing coherence between coherent droplets of water.
The principles described by Fröhlich, about superconductivity in super-coherence will be valid.
Likewise it will be based on the same concepts as those of the ionic streams in the ionospheric ‘bedding”; and a river and a bedding.
It is the relationship between Potential and Kinetic energy (the coherent water, or molecular ‘boiling’ water) which is found also in the Cosmic Gas Cloud, and the Lightning Charge Discharges that compute the location of the stars.
It is all about the relationship between information and matter.
What we perceive in our living body, must be at the basis of the existence of the virus also…
Thence this exploration:
Is the Virus a primordial form of operator, operating on the information in water, in the coherent droplets described by Cyril Smith?
If so, it is likely that a virus is not a pathogen; because it simply computes and has no own mind or meaning.
What then changed in the development of the virus, that it could encapsulate itself, not in a protein sheath but is a double lipid membrane, to develop into a microbe: the bacterial form? (This presupposes an environment in which fatty soap bubbles could form. And engendered a micro environment in which the virus can compute and replicate by dividing itself.)
More questions
More answers ¶ 09:18
